Hiptoro
  • Entertainment
    • Celebrities
  • Sports
    • NBA
    • WWE
    • NFL
  • Movies
  • TV Shows
  • Anime
  • Technology
  • Gaming
No Result
View All Result
  • Entertainment
    • Celebrities
  • Sports
    • NBA
    • WWE
    • NFL
  • Movies
  • TV Shows
  • Anime
  • Technology
  • Gaming
No Result
View All Result
Hiptoro
No Result
View All Result

Presidental electors must back their state’s popular vote winner, says Supreme Court

by Kashish Verma
5 years ago
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0

The Supreme Court made a very big decision this Monday. As they ruled unanimously that states can require presidential electors to back their states’ popular vote winner in the Electoral College. Just under four months just before 2020-elections, the ruling leaves in place laws in 32 states and the District of Columbia.

It further binds their share of the 538 electors to vote for the states’ popular-vote winner. And this unanimous decision in the “faithless elector” cases was a big defeat for those who wanted to transform the Electoral College. It also defeated all those who believed a win would lead to presidential elections based on the popular or total number of votes.

The Supreme Court rules big decision for presidential electors

Also, the justices had scheduled the arguments for the case in spring. As they wanted to resolve the issue before the election. In order, to ensure smooth functioning amid a potential political crisis after the country votes.

The Supreme Court rules big decision for presidential electors

The Supreme Court rules big decision for presidential electors

The Supreme Court heard arguments via a telephonic conversation in May amid coronavirus pandemic. But, justices invoked fears of bribery and chaos if electors could cast their ballots regardless of the popular vote outcome in their states. The three Hilary Clinton electors filed an issue that arose in lawsuits in Washington and in Colorado. They refused to vote for her despite her popular vote win in both states. In so doing, they wanted to persuade enough electors to deny the Trump presidency. The federal appeals court in Denver ruled that electors can vote as they please, rejecting arguments that they must choose the popular-vote winner.

In Washington, the state Supreme Court upheld a $1,000 fine against the three electors and rejected their claims. Thus, the court’s decision had a great impact on the minds of citizens. However, the citizens have mixed reactions to the decision. What are your views? Do let us know in the comments section below.

Tags: presidential electorsstate’s popular vote winnersupreme courtUS 2020 Electionsverdict

TRENDING NOW

John Daly

John Daly’s Bio: Early Life, Golf Career, Net Worth

August 25, 2025
Benny Safdie

Benny Safdie’s Bio: Age, Family, Career, Net Worth

August 25, 2025
Julie Bowen

Julie Bowen’s Wiki: Early Life, Movies, TV Shows, Family, Net Worth

August 25, 2025
Denis Dugan

Meet Denis Dugan: Age, Bio, Movies, TV Shows, Family, Net Worth

August 25, 2025
Lavell Crawford

Who Is Lavell Crawford? The Guy Who Played ‘Huell’ In Breaking Bad

August 25, 2025
Maxwell Friedman

Maxwell Friedman’s Age, Bio, Wrestling Career, Net Worth

August 25, 2025
hiptoro logo
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Copyright
  • About Us
  • Write for Us
  • Ethics Policy
  • Fact Checking Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy


© 2023 Hiptoro Private Limited.

No Result
View All Result
  • Entertainment
    • Celebrities
  • Sports
    • NBA
    • WWE
    • NFL
  • Movies
  • TV Shows
  • Anime
  • Technology
  • Gaming